Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Online Community

When I speak of online communities, I am talking about the access the participants have to people in other places, which can only be done through email or instant chat, and which is of a two-way nature. For example, Joe is on various mailing lists for athletic brands, and observatories, sports reports and other things of interest, but that is one-way. He receives the information.

Examples of Two-Way Online Communities

Joe and Chris have both constructed ‘groups’. Joe through Google, and Chris through MSN. Joe wished to use his group as a way of sending work to and from school and as a storage space. Chris wanted to use his group as a way of maintaining contact with his friends (that he attends school with), and having a ‘special’ enterprise just for them. Unfortunately, his friends were unable to log on. Joe had limited response from the other members in the group, but he expected that he and his classmates would work on it in the next school term.

Lisa and Charli have met many people online through two websites that that both have accessed. This was two-way communication. Their friends’ websites enabled them to leave messages on a certain page, which the author could respond to, so ongoing message boards were established with each website. Lisa made a posting on a NZ organization’s website, but had not had a reply.

Lisa accessed an online community when she shares music files. Joe, Tim and Tom said this was something they did as well, but I did not observe this activity with them.

For Charli, her online community - which she termed her ‘overseas friends’ - was of significant importance to her. Of her overseas friends, she had this to say: “Yeah, I love my friends overseas. I love them. Sometimes like I think I'm closer to them than I am like with people here, just because they're that, like I just have that much more space, cause I love, I need my personal space.” Her online community was constructed of people whose photos she had only seen on the Internet, and of who she had only spoke with through MSN Messenger, email, or postings on websites. However, her MSN contacts did include people she had physically met.

All of the participants use MSN Messenger (which they just call ‘MSN’) to communicate with their contacts. This was almost always an activity they did as well as another activity or more. All of the participants have an email address which they check their emails regularly.

Jake preferred to use the Apple Macintosh application titled ‘iChat’, though he did use MSN as well. He used iChat to ask for help from consultants at the Apple Store in regard to the networking of computers and the like. People asked him for help (through ‘MSN’ or ‘iChat’) with lighting, sound, and technical problems. The instant chat was also a form of leisure for Jake.

Anne also used MSN Messenger to play online games with her contacts (which she termed ‘buddies’). These contacts were people she had physically met. Charli often used MSN Messenger to send files, rather than conventional email (through her hotmail address).

Both Tim and Tom used forums and message boards to ask questions and receive help in regard to games they played. Tim and Tom would join up with other online players (that they knew or didn’t know) in order to better help them achieve quests for the game World of Warcraft.

Tom had used the opportunity to create websites for clans and teams that play certain games. Tom also stated that he would “ask on the net” if he needed help with website construction. Tim stated that he would “ask people on the internet” as one-way he went about learning new things.

NB: Now that I’ve written this up, I am not sure that there is enough information for this to be included. Is it interesting?

New definitions

Thoughts and feedback on the following will be much appreciated.

Dictionary definitions:

Expertise: A great skill or knowledge in a particular field.
Expert: A person who understands a particular field and is skilful at it.
Experimenting: an attempt to do something new, or a trying out of something to see what will happen, and the use of tests and trials in order to make discoveries.

New definitions:

A computer expert is: An agent who exhibits the dispositions of familiarity and confidence in engaging with the multi-faceted fields of computer literacy as a result of their cultural capital, enabling them to have spent a great deal of time experimenting with computers online and offline.

Computer expertise is: Any one of various skill levels of an agent that exhibits the dispositions of familiarity and confidence in engaging with the multi-faceted fields of computer literacy, as a result of their cultural capital, which enabled them to spend a great deal of time experimenting with computers online and offline.

What do you think of the following premise?
Skill is not the main factor in determining these experts; skill is camouflaged in their interactions with computers. It might only be determined in viewing finished products, which then need criteria in order for them to be assessed. During the process of observing an agent engaging with the multi-faceted fields of computer literacy, skill is hard to determine.

NB:
“great deal of time” is arbitrary and subjective, included on purpose.
“confidence” that the expert has is also arbitrary and subjective, and is reflective of the notion that an expert is self-assessed. The expert does not have to be affirmed by others, in order for s/he to consider him or herself an expert.

And in relation to Bourdieu:

Habitus and cultural capital enable these children to become experts, i.e.
A computer expert must have a computer (and dial-up or broadband Internet) at home that they are able to access in order to accumulate the time required (also arbitrary) to become an expert.
These computer experts did not need school to help them become an expert in this area.

© Nicola F. Johnson

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Key indicators of expertise?

Feel free to challenge this . . . .

All of the participants have referred to the amount of time (#1) needed to become an expert. All have referred to “guesswork” or “trial-and-error” or “mucking around” or “fiddling” in order to learn, and in order to gain expertise. For Example:

Regarding Time
Anne – “you become more and more experienced”.
Charli – “It was over time really, just from like going onto the other links and sites and stuff and exploring really. Yeah, just exploring. And you learn with experiences.”
Chris – Has used computers since the age of 2.
Jake – Spends approximately 5 hours per day in front of a computer.
Joe – “By probably spending time, by spending time reading things and getting other people to help me, for example, my dad, just spending time on the computer.”
Lisa – “Cause I'm using my spare time on there really, at home” (approximately 2 – 3 hrs per day).
Tim – “ . . . if you use something a lot, and you know a lot about it, and then done it for a long time . . . ”.
Tom – “So it's about having time?” T – “Yeah, having the time and patience to read”.

Regarding Experimentation (#2)
Anne - “Oh, what does this button do? Oh, look! And that sort of thing, or by accident.”
Charli – “When I stuff up . . . I know like okay, I'll go back and do this thing cause this is sort of what I do . . . and what most people do, and I'll always try that.”
Chris - He comments "I'm not getting anywhere" and tries another route (from an observation).
Jake – “I just learnt all the different sounds by listening and playing to see which does what.”
Joe – “Yknow, just browsing along and trying new things, and yeah, exploring, yep.”
Lisa – “Um, just really fiddling around on the computer and just learning from that, yeah”.
Tim – “I just try things and figure it out, and just try it, just keep trying until you get it right, yeah.”
Tom - He said through playing it, trying different things, and asking other people who were playing online (from an observation).

Experimenting is defined as: an attempt to do something new, or a trying out of something to see what will happen, and the use of tests and trials in order to make discoveries.

An update on notions of expertise

Below is my summary of each participant in a more concise form than previously posted. Each summary aims to answer the following:

What is an expert and what is expertise?
How did you become an expert and how do other people become experts? (pathway)
What is your opinion of your expertise?

Anne and her Computer Expertise

Anne was taught skills in her schooling programme at intermediate. She uses the trial-and-error method and guesswork to learn.
Anne believes one can become an expert through taking lessons, figuring out how to work it, and knowing everything about it.
She stated that as one becomes more experienced, one becomes an expert. She described a technological expert as “One that's good on the computer, [giggles] or good with their technology thing that they do.”
Anne believes she has expertise in certain programmes, and thinks expertise is programme-specific. She said she was not an expert of “the whole computer”.
She thinks there are levels of expertise from the “very advanced or basic”.
Her own rating of expertise is a 3.
Anne thinks she was more of an expert three years ago when she used a computer more often in her classroom. Her schooling currently provides limited opportunities for computer use.
Anne was possibly not sure of what the word ‘expertise’ meant as exemplified in this phrase: “I think it depends on what you'd call an expertise.” English as a subject was not her strongest subject so this may just be a reflection of not knowing about how nouns and verbs should match, etc.

Charli and her Computer Expertise

Charli defined a technological expert as “somebody that is confident with knowing their way around and stuff.” “I think that it's just someone that's confident, and they feel like they know enough about what they do to like maybe show other people, guide other people. You know like, confident with trying new things on the computer and stuff. Me [giggles].” “I used to think that an expert was somebody that knows everything, but it's not really. I just think it is somebody that's confident.”
When I asked her what types of people would create websites, i.e. how she would describe them, she said "people who know their way about computers".
Her own rating of expertise is a 3.
She explained that she became an expert over time from exploring and learning from experience.
Charli explained that one of her friend’s had called her ‘professional’ in reference to her competence at using her computer. She also said “Some of them [her friends] just think I'm just normal cause like this generation is getting up with the computer technology, like with MSN and big things like that. But then others think that I'm kind of a computer whiz, if you like, and stuff.”
Charli had three years of computers in years 7, 8, and 9, but said it was “mindless” as the sole focus was to touch-type.
She agreed with me when I suggested that both positive experiences with computers and the opportunity to do it would help with development of expertise.

Chris and his Computer Expertise

For Chris, his dad had a significant role in teaching him how to use computers, how to play games, providing equipment to use, and giving Chris the opportunity to watch him (his dad) use the computer. He also mentioned the role of teachers at his primary school who had encouraged him to gain expertise.
Chris began his pathway to expertise through playing games and then learning programmes like Word and Excel, and then moving on to graphic programmes (e.g. Flash 5).
Chris’ definition of an expert could be expressed as “one of those people who can work with computers, and can do a wide range of things with them.”
Chris believed a technological expert was made through the following: “you have to pick up the right skills, you have to search for those skills, search for the right people who are going to give you those skills, and sometimes it can just come out of the air by pure luck. But if you try and just try and make yourself shown, different people can recognize you and you will be able to pick up a few of those skills - thanks to them.”
His own rating of expertise is a 2.5.
He agreed that there were levels of expertise: “In any subject, there are many levels of expertise cause I mean, I think I've got expertise, a lot of people above me have more, and more advanced knowledge of how to do things, so they've got better expertise. Even people below me, they've still got a little bit of knowledge, so they've still got expertise in them”.
For Chris, knowing how and why things work is very important, so that has led to depth of understanding in regard to computers.
Chris was probably not sure of what the word ‘expertise’ meant as exemplified in these phrases: “. . . motivation would be one of those expertise. Knowledge of how computers work would be another one of those expertise. And um, hmmm, also a wide range of different programmes and knowledge would be perhaps one of those expertise.”

Jake and his Technological Expertise

Jake said of his expertise that “I'm always learning new stuff off people, learning new things, and about products that are out, etc.” He implied that it was an ongoing process. Jake initially stated that expertise was “knowing everything”, but admitted that there is always new stuff to learn especially as new technologies develop. He then changed his words to “having a fair idea of most stuff”. He also thinks there are levels of expertise.
Jake rates his expertise in computers as 3: his expertise in sound as between 1 and 2, and his expertise in lighting as also between 1 and 2.
While Jake has attended some courses in his three areas, and has also learnt from others, he has spent much of his time learning things by trial-and-error. He says of others: “I knew a couple of people who've learnt by just mucking around and seeing what it sounds like, without any proper training or anything like that.” This would also apply to some of Jake’s instances of learning.
Jake was not entirely comfortable with calling himself an expert, but was happy to call himself an expert ‘for his age’.

Joe and his Computer Expertise

Joe used the dictionary to research answers to the interview questions I had sent him. He had copied out the definitions for ‘expert’ and ‘expertise’ out of the dictionary and read them to me when I asked the questions: “A technological expert. I think it's a person who understands a particular field and is skilful at it.” Expertise = “A great skill or knowledge in a particular field.”
His own rating of expertise is a 2 (“I can't say a one, yeah, because there's still heaps I can potentially learn”), but Joe was not comfortable with calling himself an expert. When I asked, “What about for your age?” He replied, “My age, um, maybe, but compared to other students, well there's a couple who are like really good, so I've got something to aim at, so I don't think I'm an expert yet, no. R - Would you like to be? J - Yeah, I would, yes.” His numerical rating and his verbal rating appear to conflict.
In regard to how to become an expert, Joe said, “Just by fully understanding something, y'know, but um, and who is like really confident at doing particular things and things like that, yeah.” When asked about his level of expertise at the moment, and how he got to that level, he replied, “By probably spending time, by spending time reading things and getting other people to help me, for example, my dad, just spending time on the computer, y'know, just browsing along and trying new things, and yeah, exploring, yep.” “It's just time, yeah, and just dedication, sort of, yeah.”

Lisa and her Computer Expertise

Lisa was not initially sure of what a technological expert was. She said, “Um, an expert in technology? [laughs] Yeah, I don't really know.” However, when she was asked how she would describe her expertise in computers, she replied, “Just like knowing how the computer works really, and knowing what I want to do on the computer, and get it done, yeah.”
She did consider herself to be an expert but only for her age group, however she said, “There are other brainier people in my age group that would be a total whiz on the computer [giggles]. But yeah, but I'm pretty average.”
Her own rating of expertise is a 2 or 3, “cause um with like other technology, I can always end up working it out as well. Yeah, it just happens. It's quite strange [we both laugh]. I always get something working.”
Lisa said she thought there were “heaps of different levels” of expertise.
She believed that her pathway to computer expertise was “just really fiddling around on the computer and just learning from that, yeah”, and that she had spent “heaps” of time, and “a very long time” on the computer: “Yeah, I used to come home every day [from school] and would play on the computer, and listen to some music, mmm, about three years. R - Oh ok. So it's something that basically every week day you've done for a long time, for a couple of hours at least? L - Yeah, 2 hours.”

Tim and his Computer Expertise

Tim described a technological expert as “someone that probably knows more than the average person” and that compared to most people, i.e. the average user, he was a computer expert.
His own rating of expertise is a 3.
Tim believed he became an expert from “using it so much, and having friends that know all about it as well, to ask and get things from, yeah.” He thought that other people could become an expert in this way and elaborated by stating: “Like if they've got friends or parents that can teach them, yeah. Or if they want to find out themselves, there are things on the Internet that you can learn, yeah.”
He defined expertise as “Knowledge, experience, yeah like, oh just, I guess using, if you use something a lot, and you know a lot about it, and then done it for a long time, I guess, that's, you'd probably be an expert at it, yeah”, and he agreed that there were different levels of expertise, exemplified in this sentence: “Yeah like if you own your own business or something, and then you're good at that, whatever it is you want to do, like plumber or whatever, and you have an apprentice or something like that, they'll probably still be an expert, but not as expert as the person that is teaching them, yeah.”

Tom and his Computer Expertise

Tom thought that a technological expert was someone who was competent in something. When asked, “So would you consider yourself to be an expert in your areas of interest?” He replied, “Um, I've gotta a lot to learn still, but yeah, for my age, I'd probably be pretty competent.”
His own rating of expertise is a 2.5 or 3.
Tom said “I dunno” when asked what he thought expertise was.
Tom definitely thought there were different levels of expertise and related this to the following: “Like you could be an expert at what you do but you still do things like the old way, or the new way of coming in comes in you like have to learn how to do that and it's faster and stuff like that.” He acknowledged that part of being an expert was being part of an ongoing process of learning.
He thought that other people could become an expert in the same way he did, and said, “Um yeah, it's not that hard. Just do it on the Net. R - So it's about having time? T - Yeah, having the time and patience to read.”

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Addiction

Anne said she was “not really” addicted, but she was addicted to some games. She said she and her dad were “addicted to FreeCell, but not really the computer. Well, I couldn’t live without it, but I’m not as addicted as I know some people are who check their emails every hour and go on it every couple of hours to check for internet news, [whispers] I'm describing my dad”. Anne said none of her friends were addicted to computers or the Internet. I did not ask Anne what she thought addiction was. Anne referred to addiction as a joke. Her saying that “she couldn’t live without it” is probably more indicative of her dependence on the Internet.

Charli’s parents limit her hours on the Internet because as Charli said, “cause they think that I like I just get addicted to it, and it's unhealthy. I don't agree with that”.
In a later interview I prompted, “So you mentioned to me that you were addicted to the Internet?”
“That's just what people say I am but I'm not. Well my mum and dad say I am.”
For Charli, being banned from the Internet was a punishment not for her addiction, but for having social contact with her important overseas friends – her online community.
“I said to mum, I've done a week now but like I just wanna go back on, but then I know that everyone's disappointed in me, if I like do that. It's just so hard because, and it's not cause I'm addicted. Cause like I've got friends overseas, it's ok to not talk to my friends now because they're at school, and I see them and I can text them and ring them and stuff. But no, my friends overseas, it's like my only way through to them, it's so expensive to ring them and stuff. I don't get to text them or see them.”
During the course of the research, Charli was banned from the Internet for three months, for reasons personal to the family.
Charli defined addiction: “Like you can't go a day without, like you can't do anything without being, like without going on it. It's like an alcoholic; they can't get through a day without like having a certain amount of drinks or something. It's like somebody can't go through a day without being on the Internet for a certain amount of hours or something. Yeah.” Charli referred to addiction as a serious matter that she didn’t believe she could be fairly accused of.

Lisa referred once to addiction as a joke, in reference to her mother, who she stated was “addicted to that site” - a trader site of new and second hand items. I did not ask Lisa what she thought addiction was.

Chris, Jake, and Joe did not mention addiction.

Tim said he was not addicted to computer games, and he also implied that he thought Tom was not addicted to the computer, illustrated in the following excerpt.
“Do you think being addicted to the computer is a positive or negative thing?”
“Oh, if you were like a proper addict, probably negative [smiles]. Because like you'd fully go insane or something if you spent all day locked in a room or something [we both laugh], without going outside, doing no exercise or anything like that. Probably wouldn't be good for you. So that's probably negative.”
“Mmmm. Do you have any friends who you think are computer addicts?”
“Nah, not addicts. I've got friends the same as me, just like playing games and that, yeah. No one that's like on it 24/7 or anything like that.”
Tim’s idea of addiction included the statement, “I don't think like about it all day, every day.”

Tom said he was “definitely addicted” to the Internet. During the latter part of the research, he was banned from the Internet for six weeks for not handing in a school assignment, and read up on a World of Warcraft game manual so he could “get his fix”. I asked him before he was banned, “So what happens if you can't go on the computer?”
“Um, I haven't been without one for that long before, so I don't know.”
“So basically, you have to go on it every day?”
“Yeah, even if I'm not enjoying it, I just go on it.”
“So, what's that like then, feeling like you have to.”
“I dunno, just normal, I'm used to it. I don't feel like I'm not enjoying it very often.”
I asked him, “When do you think you first became addicted?”
“Pretty much straight away.” [we both laugh]
“So what does addiction mean to you? How would you define it?”
“You've gotta have it, like if you don't have it, you just crave it, I guess, yeah, even if you're watching somebody else and not doing it yourself.”
Because Tom’s computer use is a significant part of his identity, it is important to him, as with Charli.

I am saying “Internet” because Internet gives them access to email, instant online chat, websites, and online games, which are all part of ‘what they do’ on the computer.